Relevance: GS-2: Important International Institutions, agencies and fora - their Structure, Mandate; Global Groupings involving India and/or affecting India’s interests.
Key Phrases: Intergovernmental military alliance; strategic setback; geopolitical reset; Truman Doctrine; resuming dialogue and diplomacy.
Context
- Finland and Sweden have expressed their desire to become part of NATO.
- These declarations are the biggest strategic setback for Russian President Vladimir Putin whose most important foreign policy focus has been on weakening NATO.
Key Highlights
- What is NATO?
- North Atlantic Treaty Organisation also known as Northern Atlantic Alliance is an intergovernmental military alliance between 30 member states – 28 European states, the United States, and Canada.
- It was established in the aftermath of World War II on the
insistence of the Truman administration in the US.
- The Truman Doctrine is an American foreign policy that originated with the primary goal of containing Soviet geopolitical expansion during the Cold War
- The organization implements the North Atlantic Treaty, which was
signed on 4 April 1949.
- 12 founding members of the Alliance: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom and the United States established NATO in 1949.
- But over the years, NATO has expanded to 30 member states.
- The most recent member is North Macedonia.
What are the benefits of joining NATO?
- Military benefits
- Collective Security
- Article 5 of the treaty states that if one ally gets attacked, then it is treated as an attack on everyone.
- This offers a long-term collective defence of strategically developed countries
- When the 9/11 terrorist attacks happened, all the other members contributed to counter-terrorism retaliation in Afghanistan.
- Cyber defence capabilities
- It helps the allies to keep boosting their defences through information sharing, education investments, and ongoing training.
- Cyber defence experts work with organizations that can mobilize at a moment’s notice to help any country in the network to survive an attack.
- Developing Counter-terrorism capabilities
- A hub for allies has been established in Naples, Italy to check terrorism.
- Cost-effective Defence
- Every country must spend 2% of their GDP on defence ( Wales summit, 2014).
- The interests of every member are secured and the cost to maintain an effective army is distributed amongst countries.
- Collective Security
- Economic benefits
- Through Free Trade agreements amongst members, goods of a member's nation enjoy a competitive advantage over that of the rest of the world.
- Political benefits
- It doesn't interfere with the internal politics of the nations.
- It doesn't dilute the sovereignty of its constituent members.
- As decisions are taken unanimously, the voice of each nation is treated at par with others.
Recent proceedings in NATO
- Geopolitical reset
- Stance of Finland
- It has stayed neutral since the end of the Second World War.
- It shares a 1300 km border with Russia.
- In 1939, after Stalin's army invaded, Finland lost 10% of their territory.
- The Finns, in an alliance with the German Nazis, attacked the Soviet troops in 1940.
- Peace was established after the defeat of Nazi Germany and Finland has maintained non-alignment since then.
- But last week, the Prime Minister hoped that they would apply for NATO membership without delay.
- It has stayed neutral since the end of the Second World War.
- Stance of Sweden
- It has stayed out of military alliances for 200 years.
- But, recently it said that NATO membership would strengthen its national security and would bring stability to the Baltic and Nordic regions.
- Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24 apparently to stop NATO’s
further expansion into its neighbourhood.
- But the same invasion has pushed the two nations in its neighbourhood towards NATO’s embrace.
- Stance of Finland
Response of NATO members and Russia
- Turkey has opposed the demand of Sweden and Finland to join NATO.
- The U.S. and the U.K. are in favour of NATO’s expansion.
- Germany and France are pursuing a more cautious line.
- Hungary, which has deep ties with Russia and has already agreed to the EU’s plan to ban Russian oil imports, has not made its views clear on NATO’s expansion.
- Russia has been threatening military retaliation in response to any further expansion of NATO.
Way Forward
- NATO members should deliberate on whether the expansion of NATO will
bring further peace and stability in Europe
- The expansion would escalate the current crisis between nuclear-armed Russia and NATO to dangerous levels.
- The several rounds of NATO expansion and Russia’s territorial aggression have brought the world to its most dangerous moment since the 1962 Cuban missile crisis.
- Russia must halt the war and all stakeholders should resume dialogue and diplomacy to end this man-made crisis.
Conclusion
- The focus must be to make Russia end the war and not on expanding NATO. Only then we can start rebuilding the post-COVID global order for the betterment of humanity and offset some of the damage done by the pandemic.
Source: The Hindu
Mains Question
Q. What is NATO? How is the call for NATO’s expansion to Sweden and Finland threatening to destabilise Europe? Suggest a suitable way forward.