Daily Static MCQs Quiz for UPSC, IAS, UPPSC/UPPCS, MPPSC. BPSC, RPSC & All State PSC Exams
Subject : Polity (19 December 2023)
1. Consider the following statements, with reference to Standing Committees:
1. Standing committees are permanent and works on a continuous basis.
2. A minister is not eligible to be nominated as a member of any of the standing committees.
3. These committees should consider the matters of day-to-day administration of the concerned ministries.
4. The recommendations tendered by these committees are permanent and binding on the Parliament.
How many of the above statements are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) Only three
(d) All four
Answer: (B)
Explanation: Standing Committees are permanent and works on a continuous basis. Its main objective is to secure more accountability of the executive to the Parliament, particularly financial accountability. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
A minister is not eligible to be nominated as a member of any of the standing committees. In case a member, after his nomination to any of the standing committees, is appointed as minister, he then ceases to be a member of the committee. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
They should not consider the matters of day-to-day administration of the concerned ministries/ departments. Hence, statement 3 is incorrect. Also, they should not generally consider the matters which are considered by other Parliamentary committees.
The recommendations of these committees are advisory in nature and Hence, not binding on the Parliament. Hence, statement 4 is incorrect.
2. Consider the following statements:
Statement I - The courts in India consider "due process of law" in addition to the "procedure established by law" while interpreting Article 21.
Statement II - The inclusion of "due process of law" ensures that the procedure followed is fair, just, and reasonable, protecting the rights of individuals.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
(a) Both Statement - I and Statement - II are correct and Statement - II is the correct explanation for Statement-I
(b) Both Statement - I and Statement - II are correct and Statement - II is not the correct explanation for Statement - I
(c) Statement - I is correct but Statement - II is incorrect
(d) Statement - I is incorrect but Statement - II is correct
Answer: (A)
Explanation: The courts in India do consider "due process of law" in addition to the "procedure established by law" while interpreting Article 21. This means that they not only focus on whether the prescribed legal procedure has been followed but also ensure that the procedure is fair, just, and reasonable. Hence statement – I is correct.
The inclusion of "due process of law" ensures that the procedure followed is fair, just, and reasonable, thereby protecting the rights of individuals.
By incorporating "due process of law," the legal system aims to prevent arbitrary or unjust actions that may infringe upon an individual's rights. It guarantees that individuals are provided with fundamental safeguards and protections during legal proceedings, contributing to the overall fairness and justice of the procedure. Hence statement – II is correct.
Thus, Both Statement - I and Statement - II are correct and Statement - II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.
3. With reference to the President of India, consider the following statements:
1. It is mandatory for the President to work with the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
2. When the Council of Ministers resigns, the President acts as per his discretion.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
(a) Only 1
(b) Only 2
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: (C)
Explanation: According to Article 74(1) of the Indian Constitution, “There shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid and advise the President in the exercise of his functions.” This means that, in most cases, the President is bound to act based on the advice of the Council. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
When the Council of Ministers resigns, the President acts as per his discretion. This is because a resignation creates a vacuum in the executive branch. The President has the power to call upon the Council to continue in office until a new government is formed or dissolve the Lok Sabha and call for fresh elections. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
4. With reference to the Charter Act, 1813, consider the following statements:
1. By this act the trading monopoly of the British East India Company (the monopoly on the trade with China and tea remained) was abolished.
2. In this act, a provision of one lakh rupees was made every year for the spread of education in India.
3. The revenue of India came under the control of the British Parliament.
How many of the above statements are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All three
(d) None
Answer: (B)
Explanation: By the Charter Act, 1813 the trading monopoly of the British East India Company (the monopoly on the trade of China and tea remained) was abolished. Also, through this act, the sovereignty of the British Crown over the Indian territories occupied by the Company was also strengthened. Hence statement 1 is correct.
In this act, a provision of one lakh rupees was made every year for the spread of education in India. In 1823, the General Committee of Public Instruction was formed, in whose responsibility there was a provision of giving one lakh rupees for education, so statement 2 is also correct.
The revenue of India was brought under the direct control of the British Parliament by the Act of 1858 AD. Hence statement 3 is not correct.
5. With reference to the Constitution Amendment Bill, consider the following statements:
1. The Constitution Amendment Bill must be passed by a two-thirds majority of the members of each House present and voting.
2. A deadlock arising out of disagreement between the two Houses on such a Bill should be resolved by a joint sitting of both the Houses.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 Nor 2
Answer: (A)
Explanation: The bill must be passed by a special majority in each House i.e. by a majority (i.e. more than 50%) of the total membership of the House and by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting from the House. Hence statement 1 is correct.
Each house has to pass the bill separately. In case of disagreement between the two Houses, there is no provision for holding a joint sitting of both the Houses for the purpose of deliberation and passing of the Bill. Hence statement 2 is not correct.
